"Creation of the Sun and Moon" by Michelangelo‘Poetry in the Image of God’ by James A. Tweedie The Society April 5, 2024 Beauty, Education, Poetry 12 Comments . Poetry in the Image of God Conjure and weave a calligraphic spell Within the wells of mystic words and themes, And bring to life a voice with tales to tell Of life and death, of laughter, love, and dreams. Conceive, command, contrive, connive, cajole From sweet romance or willful, righteous rage, A scattered babel, tamed, re-formed, made whole To fit and fill a-virgin-pure, unblemished page. Uplift, inspire, create, control, conspire To wrest it from its tangled, mangled must And with an ink-tipped plume, consume with fire Till phoenix-like it rises from the dust Alive, to speak and to be understood. Incarnate words. And God said, “It is good.” . . James A. Tweedie is a retired pastor living in Long Beach, Washington. He has written and published six novels, one collection of short stories, and three collections of poetry including Mostly Sonnets, all with Dunecrest Press. His poems have been published nationally and internationally in The Lyric, Poetry Salzburg (Austria) Review, California Quarterly, Asses of Parnassus, Lighten Up Online, Better than Starbucks, Dwell Time, Light, Deronda Review, The Road Not Taken, Fevers of the Mind, Sparks of Calliope, Dancing Poetry, WestWard Quarterly, Society of Classical Poets, and The Chained Muse. He was honored with being chosen as the winner of the 2021 SCP International Poetry Competition. NOTE TO READERS: If you enjoyed this poem or other content, please consider making a donation to the Society of Classical Poets. The Society of Classical Poets does not endorse any views expressed in individual poems or commentary. Share this:Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)Click to print (Opens in new window)Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)Trending now: 12 Responses Roy Eugene Peterson April 5, 2024 Amazing alliteration contained in an inspired context with beautiful rhyme. Reply Warren Bonham April 5, 2024 It doesn’t count quite as much when I say it, but I do think “it is good”. Great message and I really enjoyed the alliteration. Reply Margaret Coats April 5, 2024 James, your many verbs suggest that the image of God may appear in most genres of poetry. I say “most” because, although I can’t think of one, there could be some obscure one in some tradition not suited to this purpose. But going beyond genre to the final purpose of literature–using words to transcend what words can express–your poem implies the function of the poet to create in imitation of God’s multifarious creation. For that reason, it is good to end with God’s statement on each day of the Creation Week. When I think of the thousands of love lyrics (secular and religious) that I studied in preparation for my dissertation, very few were impressive poetry. But I found something good (the vestige of the creative God) in almost all. You’re right; keep up the good work! Reply James A. Tweedie April 5, 2024 Margaret, You are not wrong to expand the intent of my poem to embrace poetry as a whole. The intent of the poem, however, was a personal one–an attempt to describe the process I go through when I create a poem. Finding a voice through which to speak. Choosing a vocabulary. Embracing a subject and/or emotion to speak through/from. Scattering, juggling words to capture the meaning or effect as part of a creative search for form. Putting the words on the page and then shuffling them, rearranging, reshaping, and even replacing them until the parts rise from the ashes as a whole, having been shaped int a form and breathed into life so that the words and the poem as a whole have the power to speak and be heard by ears other than that of the poet. All of this in imitation of the Creator of all who said, “It is good.” Not all poetry is God-good, of course, including much of my own. But when the breath of life comes through me from a Source greater than myself, I can usually tell. And it is then that–satis est–I can believe that my poem (by grace) has risen to the level of being what I might hope to be God-good. Reply Cynthia Erlandson April 5, 2024 Beautiful, James. And the final couplet is truly marvelous. Reply Paul A. Freeman April 5, 2024 Most limericks aren’t about love, or being a peace-loving dove. Yet wholesome or rude, one’s words are imbued with talent from Him up above. Thanks for the read, James. I was inspired – as you can tell. Reply C.B. Anderson April 5, 2024 A perfect account of creation (or Creation), this poem is a smack in the face of any would-be poet who fails to aim high. I’m thankful for the reminder. Reply Jeff Eardley April 6, 2024 Jim, a wonderful insight into the creative process. Long may your flaming, ink-tipped plume continue to inspire. Thank you. Reply Alan Orsborn April 8, 2024 You describe writing a poem as wrestling with the words on the page until they fall into their proper place. I was thinking about the creative process the other day, and at that time it seemed to me to be identical to carving something from a block of wood, releasing the form that was there all along. I think we both are describing the same process. Starting with nothing and arriving at something. This is neither here nor there, but I’ve gone back to typing my poems. It slows down the process and puts me in better control. Using the laptop, edits are way too easy and I lose control of the whole project, it gets away from me. It’s like carving a block of wood down to a nub. Reply James A. Tweedie April 18, 2024 Me? Mostly on my PC. Sometimes, when I away or on a trip, on my iPhone. In a pinch, paper and pen/pencil. I literally think through my fingers and can type almost as fast as I can think. And I like my edits to be as easy as possible! Thanks for t he comment, Alan. Reply James Sale April 10, 2024 The strength of a language – and so of poetry – is always in its verbs. Weak poets are masters of adjectives, and are constantly fiddling with them; but here we see clearly the power of Tweedie’s writing in the use of the imperative verbal form. Masterly. One interesting side note on this, is that who uses the imperative form in the Bible, that is, uses it much? Well, the Lord God in the Old Testament and … Jesus Christ in the New. Indeed, the incredible usage of the imperative tense in the New Testament by Christ is the linguistic, stylistic ‘proof’ that He is the identical person to the One called Yahweh in the Old. Since Tweedies’ poem is in the ‘image’ of God, it is wonderfully appropriate that it should adopt this grammatical feature. Finally, we can conclude that the characteristic of God (that is, Being) that we can derive from his linguistic patterning, is that God (Being) is a God of action and command! Reply James A. Tweedie April 18, 2024 God’s one great imperative is for us to love one another as Christ loved us. All else is annotation. Reply Leave a Reply Cancel ReplyYour email address will not be published.CommentName* Email* Website Notify me of follow-up comments by email. Notify me of new posts by email. Δ This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
Roy Eugene Peterson April 5, 2024 Amazing alliteration contained in an inspired context with beautiful rhyme. Reply
Warren Bonham April 5, 2024 It doesn’t count quite as much when I say it, but I do think “it is good”. Great message and I really enjoyed the alliteration. Reply
Margaret Coats April 5, 2024 James, your many verbs suggest that the image of God may appear in most genres of poetry. I say “most” because, although I can’t think of one, there could be some obscure one in some tradition not suited to this purpose. But going beyond genre to the final purpose of literature–using words to transcend what words can express–your poem implies the function of the poet to create in imitation of God’s multifarious creation. For that reason, it is good to end with God’s statement on each day of the Creation Week. When I think of the thousands of love lyrics (secular and religious) that I studied in preparation for my dissertation, very few were impressive poetry. But I found something good (the vestige of the creative God) in almost all. You’re right; keep up the good work! Reply
James A. Tweedie April 5, 2024 Margaret, You are not wrong to expand the intent of my poem to embrace poetry as a whole. The intent of the poem, however, was a personal one–an attempt to describe the process I go through when I create a poem. Finding a voice through which to speak. Choosing a vocabulary. Embracing a subject and/or emotion to speak through/from. Scattering, juggling words to capture the meaning or effect as part of a creative search for form. Putting the words on the page and then shuffling them, rearranging, reshaping, and even replacing them until the parts rise from the ashes as a whole, having been shaped int a form and breathed into life so that the words and the poem as a whole have the power to speak and be heard by ears other than that of the poet. All of this in imitation of the Creator of all who said, “It is good.” Not all poetry is God-good, of course, including much of my own. But when the breath of life comes through me from a Source greater than myself, I can usually tell. And it is then that–satis est–I can believe that my poem (by grace) has risen to the level of being what I might hope to be God-good. Reply
Paul A. Freeman April 5, 2024 Most limericks aren’t about love, or being a peace-loving dove. Yet wholesome or rude, one’s words are imbued with talent from Him up above. Thanks for the read, James. I was inspired – as you can tell. Reply
C.B. Anderson April 5, 2024 A perfect account of creation (or Creation), this poem is a smack in the face of any would-be poet who fails to aim high. I’m thankful for the reminder. Reply
Jeff Eardley April 6, 2024 Jim, a wonderful insight into the creative process. Long may your flaming, ink-tipped plume continue to inspire. Thank you. Reply
Alan Orsborn April 8, 2024 You describe writing a poem as wrestling with the words on the page until they fall into their proper place. I was thinking about the creative process the other day, and at that time it seemed to me to be identical to carving something from a block of wood, releasing the form that was there all along. I think we both are describing the same process. Starting with nothing and arriving at something. This is neither here nor there, but I’ve gone back to typing my poems. It slows down the process and puts me in better control. Using the laptop, edits are way too easy and I lose control of the whole project, it gets away from me. It’s like carving a block of wood down to a nub. Reply
James A. Tweedie April 18, 2024 Me? Mostly on my PC. Sometimes, when I away or on a trip, on my iPhone. In a pinch, paper and pen/pencil. I literally think through my fingers and can type almost as fast as I can think. And I like my edits to be as easy as possible! Thanks for t he comment, Alan. Reply
James Sale April 10, 2024 The strength of a language – and so of poetry – is always in its verbs. Weak poets are masters of adjectives, and are constantly fiddling with them; but here we see clearly the power of Tweedie’s writing in the use of the imperative verbal form. Masterly. One interesting side note on this, is that who uses the imperative form in the Bible, that is, uses it much? Well, the Lord God in the Old Testament and … Jesus Christ in the New. Indeed, the incredible usage of the imperative tense in the New Testament by Christ is the linguistic, stylistic ‘proof’ that He is the identical person to the One called Yahweh in the Old. Since Tweedies’ poem is in the ‘image’ of God, it is wonderfully appropriate that it should adopt this grammatical feature. Finally, we can conclude that the characteristic of God (that is, Being) that we can derive from his linguistic patterning, is that God (Being) is a God of action and command! Reply
James A. Tweedie April 18, 2024 God’s one great imperative is for us to love one another as Christ loved us. All else is annotation. Reply