“Aristotle Contemplating a Bust of Homer” by Rembrandt van Rijn.‘Contemplating Aristotle Contemplating a Bust of Homer’ by James A. Tweedie The Society June 22, 2021 Art, Beauty, Culture, Ekphrastic, Homer, Poetry 9 Comments . Contemplating Aristotle Contemplating a Bust of Homer He stands enwrapped in luminous shadowed light, A woven cord of gold across his chest, Voluminous silk sleeves of purest white Contrast the deep-black velvet of his vest. Arrayed as though he were a wealthy man; A citizen of Rembrandt’s Amsterdam. An Aristotle lost in time and space; The Netherlands reborn as ancient Greece; The past as present, brush-stroked into place, An artist’s metaphoric masterpiece. As time stands still, the sage’s eyes embrace The enigmatic, stone-blind Homer’s face. The famed philosopher and polymath Of all that is and was and yet shall be, Now walks his thoughts down a mimetic path That leads to music, art and poetry, And lays his hand of blessing on the head Of one whose words yet live though he be dead. Like Aristotle we look to the past, And see Achilles on the fields of Troy. And from that tragic tale return at last To home, a wife’s long-suffering love, and joy. We place the bust of Homer on our shelves And deem him greater than we deem ourselves. . . James A. Tweedie is a retired pastor living in Long Beach, Washington. He has written and published six novels, one collection of short stories, and three collections of poetry including Mostly Sonnets, all with Dunecrest Press. His poems have been published nationally and internationally in The Lyric, Poetry Salzburg (Austria) Review, California Quarterly, Asses of Parnassus, Lighten Up Online, Better than Starbucks, WestWard Quarterly, Society of Classical Poets, and The Chained Muse. NOTE TO READERS: If you enjoyed this poem or other content, please consider making a donation to the Society of Classical Poets. The Society of Classical Poets does not endorse any views expressed in individual poems or commentary. Trending now: 9 Responses Paul Buchheit June 22, 2021 Very nice, James. A work of art on your own part. Reply Andrew Benson Brown June 22, 2021 A lovely ekphrastic poem, James—and featuring one of the early theorists of ekphrasis! Rather strange about Aristotle’s updated raiment…am guessing this was also meant to double as a portrait of some Netherlandish merchant? Reply David Whippman June 27, 2021 Andrew, I think it was often the custom for artists to paint scenes from antiquity with the characters wearing clothes from the artist’s own period. Reply Paul Freeman June 22, 2021 I enjoyed that. Thanks for the read, James. Reply BDW June 22, 2021 As per Cees Wilard Bui: Structurally, the poem is four sixtaines (sestets) of iambic pentameter with an English rhyme scheme of ABABCC, like that used by Shakespeare in his “Venus and Adonis” of 199 stanzas. Mr. Tweedie’s “Contemplating Aristotle Contemplating a Bust of Homer” is opmerkelijk, worthy of presence in an anthology of 21st century poetry. My favourite rhyme is luminous and voluminous, and though I like the entire poem, my favourite parts are the tweede stanza and the final couplet. Reply James A. Tweedie June 23, 2021 Thank you, Bruce for your kind words (although one of them, “opmerkilijk,” I had to look up!). When I submitted the poem Evan drew my attention to one you had posted on the same subject several years ago. There are, of course, enough stories in this painting to inspire any number of poetic inventions. No doubt there are more being written even as I write! All the best to you and to the others who took the time to comment on my poem. Reply Julian D. Woodruff June 23, 2021 Thank you for an excellent poem, Mr. Tweedie. The more we remember outstanding instances of venerating cultural icons the more resistance is built to facile cancellation. (Speaking as someone not prepared to deck anyone foaming at the mouth to bomb a California mission or a school named after Lewis and Clark) Reply Roy E. Peterson February 1, 2022 James, your poem indeed in remarkable (opmerkelijk in Dutch). No wonder you received first place! Congratulations! Reply Murray Alfredson December 17, 2022 I am sad to find myself commenting thus, because I do enjoy others’ success. and giving praise where praise is due. I thought to follow up a winning poem to see what went down well the Society’s judges. I was disappointed. A fundamental quality I expect and aim at in all writing, be that poetry, narrative prose or discursive prose, is economy of expression. In poetry this principle is fundamental. Every word and indeed, syllable needs to pull its weight. Empty words diffuse the impact, just as striking with the shaft of an umbrella has scant impact compared against a thrust with the point. I have to confess that the writer here lost me with his opening line. Provisionally, I passed over, for example, the prefix of ‘enwrapped’ since it contributes nothing that is not already embodied in ‘wrapped’. Moving on, what does ‘luminous’ add that is not said in the noun it qualifies, ‘light’. Generally, adjectives and adverbs can be a trap for writers, as they retard the pace of a sentence, be that pace in sketching action or developing an argument. Last, ‘luminous’ and ‘shadowed’ carry a contradiction the poet fails to develop as a paradox. One is left wondering what his opening line means. Sorry, James, whatever you might have had to say, you are simply padding the metre. Some poets, such as Donne of Hopkins, write with a brilliant intensity of style and word-choice. Such writing is startling and arresting. Others like Hardy are less obtrusive in their impact while being equally vivid. Think of lines like ‘the candles mooning each face’ or the implicit darkness of ‘I went by star and planet shine’. No, James, your poem’s opening hook was so limp that I had better things to do than read further. I felt it important in the interests of good poetry to say these things. They particularly need saying for those who wish to bring about a come-back after the destructive effects of the Imagist movement on more formal poetry over 100 years ago. Reply Leave a Reply Cancel ReplyYour email address will not be published.CommentName* Email* Website Δ This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
Andrew Benson Brown June 22, 2021 A lovely ekphrastic poem, James—and featuring one of the early theorists of ekphrasis! Rather strange about Aristotle’s updated raiment…am guessing this was also meant to double as a portrait of some Netherlandish merchant? Reply
David Whippman June 27, 2021 Andrew, I think it was often the custom for artists to paint scenes from antiquity with the characters wearing clothes from the artist’s own period. Reply
BDW June 22, 2021 As per Cees Wilard Bui: Structurally, the poem is four sixtaines (sestets) of iambic pentameter with an English rhyme scheme of ABABCC, like that used by Shakespeare in his “Venus and Adonis” of 199 stanzas. Mr. Tweedie’s “Contemplating Aristotle Contemplating a Bust of Homer” is opmerkelijk, worthy of presence in an anthology of 21st century poetry. My favourite rhyme is luminous and voluminous, and though I like the entire poem, my favourite parts are the tweede stanza and the final couplet. Reply
James A. Tweedie June 23, 2021 Thank you, Bruce for your kind words (although one of them, “opmerkilijk,” I had to look up!). When I submitted the poem Evan drew my attention to one you had posted on the same subject several years ago. There are, of course, enough stories in this painting to inspire any number of poetic inventions. No doubt there are more being written even as I write! All the best to you and to the others who took the time to comment on my poem. Reply
Julian D. Woodruff June 23, 2021 Thank you for an excellent poem, Mr. Tweedie. The more we remember outstanding instances of venerating cultural icons the more resistance is built to facile cancellation. (Speaking as someone not prepared to deck anyone foaming at the mouth to bomb a California mission or a school named after Lewis and Clark) Reply
Roy E. Peterson February 1, 2022 James, your poem indeed in remarkable (opmerkelijk in Dutch). No wonder you received first place! Congratulations! Reply
Murray Alfredson December 17, 2022 I am sad to find myself commenting thus, because I do enjoy others’ success. and giving praise where praise is due. I thought to follow up a winning poem to see what went down well the Society’s judges. I was disappointed. A fundamental quality I expect and aim at in all writing, be that poetry, narrative prose or discursive prose, is economy of expression. In poetry this principle is fundamental. Every word and indeed, syllable needs to pull its weight. Empty words diffuse the impact, just as striking with the shaft of an umbrella has scant impact compared against a thrust with the point. I have to confess that the writer here lost me with his opening line. Provisionally, I passed over, for example, the prefix of ‘enwrapped’ since it contributes nothing that is not already embodied in ‘wrapped’. Moving on, what does ‘luminous’ add that is not said in the noun it qualifies, ‘light’. Generally, adjectives and adverbs can be a trap for writers, as they retard the pace of a sentence, be that pace in sketching action or developing an argument. Last, ‘luminous’ and ‘shadowed’ carry a contradiction the poet fails to develop as a paradox. One is left wondering what his opening line means. Sorry, James, whatever you might have had to say, you are simply padding the metre. Some poets, such as Donne of Hopkins, write with a brilliant intensity of style and word-choice. Such writing is startling and arresting. Others like Hardy are less obtrusive in their impact while being equally vivid. Think of lines like ‘the candles mooning each face’ or the implicit darkness of ‘I went by star and planet shine’. No, James, your poem’s opening hook was so limp that I had better things to do than read further. I felt it important in the interests of good poetry to say these things. They particularly need saying for those who wish to bring about a come-back after the destructive effects of the Imagist movement on more formal poetry over 100 years ago. Reply