Photo of the stonechat.‘The Stonechat Listens At The Asylum Window’ by Charles Southerland The Society January 25, 2023 Beauty, Culture, Humor, Poetry 31 Comments . The Stonechat Listens at the Asylum Window I fear I might mistranslate what you said And lose the very essence of your words. May I record you as I do the birds: The warbler, shrike and wren, red’s wild-combed head Who can’t fly straight because his wings are strained By his erratic breaths—the young cock quail Who only knows four notes, the nightingale? Perhaps the mockingbird who has profaned The puerile bluebird to his detriment? I listen to them all here in the field Or from the house, the wood, the swimming pond, The deer-stand in the right-of-way, the tent I hid in, hunting, while my body healed— As you well know, from wreckage and its rent. You are the bird of paradise; I’m fond Of you beyond compare, despite your squawk When you were ill with me, the bedroom talk, Too colorful for feathers to respond. But when you left, it was the hardest thing, This separation. Distance has allure, It surely does. Migration’s not a cure. These days, your speech has turned to twittering. I asked if you were lonely; you said, no. I wondered if I heard you nearly right. I am the red-winged blackbird’s gulping tone, The swallow, swift, the collared dove, hoopoe— No, not the Merlin, hunting late tonight. I am the loon, I am the loon, alone. . . Charles Southerland is a farmer who writes poetry and short stories. He also makes and sells walking sticks, canes and shillelaghs. He has been published in The Blue Unicorn, The Lyric, The Dead Mule, Measure, Trinacria, The Pennsylvania Review, The Hypertexts, Expansive Poetry Online, The Journal of Formal Poetry, The Ekphrastic Review, First Things and numerous other good poetry journals. He is American by birth and Scottish by heritage. He can trace his recent roots to the 1600s in Dunfermline and Torryburn in County Fife, Scotland. NOTE TO READERS: If you enjoyed this poem or other content, please consider making a donation to the Society of Classical Poets. The Society of Classical Poets does not endorse any views expressed in individual poems or commentary. Trending now: 31 Responses James Sale January 25, 2023 Love this poem – strange and almost mystical quality to it, and the last line is haunting. Really good – well done. Reply Charles Southerland January 29, 2023 Thank you, James; this is more than I could hope for. I appreciate it greatly. Reply James Sale February 1, 2023 PS. and yes, Charles, it’s great to have you back – you are a fine talent and poet. Gerry Poster January 25, 2023 Congratulations on a marvelous achievement. This poem (both its splendid versification and multilayered ideas) remained stuck in my head, as do the best, for quite some time. I hope to read more of your work; thank you for this gift. Reply Charles Southerland January 29, 2023 You are very welcome, Gerry. I hope to have some more poems in the near future. And a book of poems come Spring. Reply Sally cook January 25, 2023 Dear Charlie – I would expect nothing less from you than this — a fine poem in every way. Reply Charles Southerland January 29, 2023 I love you and Bob, Sally, never forget. Reply Susan Jarvis Bryant January 25, 2023 This poem is hauntingly beautiful on many levels. I love the language of the birds and you have captured these avian wonders’ ethereal splendor in some soaring lines. I particularly like: “Too colorful for feathers to respond.” – so much in so few… just like the title and the closing line… it leaves this reader wanting to know more, much more. The onomatopoeic close is a stroke of poetic genius that has left my heart aching. An exquisite poem that fires my senses and makes me burn to pick up my pen. Thank you, Charles! Reply Charles Southerland January 29, 2023 Susan, there are a good many lines in this poem that are autobiographical. but not the asylum, though. The poem took a few days to write because of research and the proper sound/wording. I’m tickled you correctly pinned the final line down. It took a day all by itself. I had to look up the birds of Paradise. Down there in Texas, you have the Texas Bird of Paradise. Beep, beep. Reply Cynthia Erlandson January 25, 2023 I agree — this is quite a gripping story, especially the last line, but also “These days your speech has turned to twittering.” Reply Charles Southerland January 29, 2023 Hi, Cynthia, the twittering line was about the birds twittering but it also worked for Twitter, which I thought of later. Thank you. Reply Julian D. Woodruff January 25, 2023 It seems every tool of poetry is within your reach; you select judiciously, use to best effect, and place the results unerringly, as your imagination leads. Enviable! Reply Charles E. Southerland January 31, 2023 Julian, I work very hard to put out the best poems possible. Thanks for reading my work. Reply Paul Freeman January 25, 2023 Such a human poem, of pain and strained relationships that can only be expressed ornithologically (if that’s a word) – at least that’s my take on the poem. The stonechat’s call, sounding like two stones knocking together, seems to reinforce my thoughts. Beautifully written, too, Charles. Reply Charles Southerland January 31, 2023 You are right, Paul. Strained is an understatement. Thanks so much for your comment. Reply Charles Southerland January 31, 2023 You are right, Paul Freeman. Strained is an understatement. Thanks so much for your comment. Reply Paul Buchheit January 25, 2023 I can hear the birds as I’m reading, Charles. Very nice! Reply Charles E. Southerland January 31, 2023 You got it, Paul. Thank you! Reply Brandon Jowell January 25, 2023 I love poetry like this! I often see myself in the animals around me. There is much to learn by watching and being honest with oneself! Reply C.B. Anderson January 25, 2023 It’s good to hear from you again, Charlie. I’m sorry we’ve been out of touch these past couple of years. Reply Charles Southerland January 29, 2023 Yes, Kip, it’s been awhile. We should catch up soon. Reply Cheryl Corey January 26, 2023 A beautiful poem. This brought to mind a poem I once read by Christopher Cranch (1815-1892). I thought you might enjoy it, so I’m sharing it here. Bird Language One day in the bluest of summer weather, Sketching under a whispering oak, I heard five bobolinks laughing together Over some ornithological joke. What the fun was I couldn’t discover. Language of birds is a riddle on earth. What could they find in whiteweed and clover To split their sides with such musical mirth? Was it some prank of the prodigal summer, Face in the cloud or voice in the breeze, Querulous catbird, woodpecker drummer, Cawing of crows high over the trees? Was it some chipmunk’s chatter, or weasel Under the stone-wall stealthy and sly? Or was the joke about me at my easel, Trying to catch the tints of the sky? Still they flew tipsily, shaking all over, Bubbling with jollity, brimful of glee, While I sat listening deep in the clover, Wondering what their jargon could be. ‘Twas but the voice of a morning the brightest That ever dawned over yon shadowy hills; ‘Twas but the song of all joy that is lightest,— Sunshine breaking in laughter and trills. Vain to conjecture the words they are singing; Only by tones can we follow the tune In the full heart of the summer fields ringing, Ringing the rhythmical gladness of June! Reply BDW January 26, 2023 Mr. Southerland’s “A Stonechat Listens at the Asylum Window” is a remarkable sonnet arabesque. A Southern Man by Cause Bewilder “I am the red-winged blackbird’s gulping tone, The swallow, swift, the collared dove, the hoopoe—” —Charles Southerland I picture him in plaid, a rimy Whitman from the South, a white unwieldy beard, a taste of bile in his mouth, a feral hog upon a sharp, ridged hill, from Arkansas, who showed some of the symptom’s, but did not have Parkinson’s. He was too real. I couldn’t take his diction for too long. His language was too rich, too filled with life, I couldn’t yawn. I longed to flee; he kept reminding me of character, and what it was to be a poet in America. Good Lord, a stupid hoopoe. Who, who, who, o, who is he? Not Poe within primeval wood, nor Faulkner in a tree. Reply C.B. Anderson January 28, 2023 Parkinson’s/Arkansas is brilliant and so is character/America. Charlie is everything you say, and more. Reply BDW January 31, 2023 I notice that recently Mr. Anderson is loosening up in his rhymescape. Is it about time? Charles Southerland January 29, 2023 Dear Bruce, how am I supposed to reply to that? I don’t even know where to begin. Thank you from the very bottom. Reply BDW January 31, 2023 Not an Apostrophe to Charles Southerland by Cause Bewilder As I scan poetry in English in the NewMillennium, I have felt the need to write a tennos on Mr. Southerland’s poetry for some time, which I both admire, and dislike, for so many reasons. As I have pointed out some of my complaints elsewhere @ SCP, I shan’t do so here. “The Stonechat Listens…” was particularly interesting to me after writing “Coronal”, which was infested with Texan birds, having left the Pacific Northwest and its bird flows in the previous decade. First, and foremost, the poetry of Charles Southerland is so good…comparatively. I cannot think of another present-day writer who does as much as he does with English; and part of it is that he is just so damn American, not internationally and historic’lly, like Mr. Yankevich (whose syllabics were among the more interesting of the NewMillennium), but rather targeted, like Mr. Anderson’s verse, or the prose of Mr. Thoreau. In fact, while reading and rereading “The Stonechat Listens…” I thought time and again of Mr. Thoreau and the birds, not Mr. Audubon (but particularly the loon of “Walden”), and only secondarily of Mr. Roethke’s verse. What I thought was most striking about the last line, was its Keatsian note. [And though I do admire the work of Keats, I do not share the enthusiasm for Keats of writers, like Canadian poet Mr. Gosselin.] I wanted to include Thoreau in the lines of “A Southern Man”, but I didn’t want to disrupt the final line’s major pun. There were many other things I wanted to include; however, not the apostrophe, which was inadvertently left in. Janice Canerdy January 26, 2023 Such a vividly descriptive, deeply meaningful poem! To me, it expresses the theme, “I become a part of all I appreciate and understand.” Reply Charles Souherland January 27, 2023 Sorry for the delay in response. The snowstorm knocked out our power the past four days. Still working on repairs. Thanks for all your kind comments. I will respond to each in kind soon. All my best, Charlie. Reply Monika Cooper February 2, 2023 I asked if you were lonely; you said, no. I wondered if I heard you nearly right. How to live with an answer like that? The poem haunts and hints of many things, things that lie between the speaker and the once-close distant one. It protects its spaces. A overheard conversation, with resonances but a heart of mystery, like the voices of birds. Reply Charles Southerland February 4, 2023 Monika, those two lines are the premise of the entire poem. Very astute reading. Thanks. Reply Leave a Reply Cancel ReplyYour email address will not be published.CommentName* Email* Website Δ This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
James Sale January 25, 2023 Love this poem – strange and almost mystical quality to it, and the last line is haunting. Really good – well done. Reply
Charles Southerland January 29, 2023 Thank you, James; this is more than I could hope for. I appreciate it greatly. Reply
James Sale February 1, 2023 PS. and yes, Charles, it’s great to have you back – you are a fine talent and poet.
Gerry Poster January 25, 2023 Congratulations on a marvelous achievement. This poem (both its splendid versification and multilayered ideas) remained stuck in my head, as do the best, for quite some time. I hope to read more of your work; thank you for this gift. Reply
Charles Southerland January 29, 2023 You are very welcome, Gerry. I hope to have some more poems in the near future. And a book of poems come Spring. Reply
Sally cook January 25, 2023 Dear Charlie – I would expect nothing less from you than this — a fine poem in every way. Reply
Susan Jarvis Bryant January 25, 2023 This poem is hauntingly beautiful on many levels. I love the language of the birds and you have captured these avian wonders’ ethereal splendor in some soaring lines. I particularly like: “Too colorful for feathers to respond.” – so much in so few… just like the title and the closing line… it leaves this reader wanting to know more, much more. The onomatopoeic close is a stroke of poetic genius that has left my heart aching. An exquisite poem that fires my senses and makes me burn to pick up my pen. Thank you, Charles! Reply
Charles Southerland January 29, 2023 Susan, there are a good many lines in this poem that are autobiographical. but not the asylum, though. The poem took a few days to write because of research and the proper sound/wording. I’m tickled you correctly pinned the final line down. It took a day all by itself. I had to look up the birds of Paradise. Down there in Texas, you have the Texas Bird of Paradise. Beep, beep. Reply
Cynthia Erlandson January 25, 2023 I agree — this is quite a gripping story, especially the last line, but also “These days your speech has turned to twittering.” Reply
Charles Southerland January 29, 2023 Hi, Cynthia, the twittering line was about the birds twittering but it also worked for Twitter, which I thought of later. Thank you. Reply
Julian D. Woodruff January 25, 2023 It seems every tool of poetry is within your reach; you select judiciously, use to best effect, and place the results unerringly, as your imagination leads. Enviable! Reply
Charles E. Southerland January 31, 2023 Julian, I work very hard to put out the best poems possible. Thanks for reading my work. Reply
Paul Freeman January 25, 2023 Such a human poem, of pain and strained relationships that can only be expressed ornithologically (if that’s a word) – at least that’s my take on the poem. The stonechat’s call, sounding like two stones knocking together, seems to reinforce my thoughts. Beautifully written, too, Charles. Reply
Charles Southerland January 31, 2023 You are right, Paul. Strained is an understatement. Thanks so much for your comment. Reply
Charles Southerland January 31, 2023 You are right, Paul Freeman. Strained is an understatement. Thanks so much for your comment. Reply
Brandon Jowell January 25, 2023 I love poetry like this! I often see myself in the animals around me. There is much to learn by watching and being honest with oneself! Reply
C.B. Anderson January 25, 2023 It’s good to hear from you again, Charlie. I’m sorry we’ve been out of touch these past couple of years. Reply
Cheryl Corey January 26, 2023 A beautiful poem. This brought to mind a poem I once read by Christopher Cranch (1815-1892). I thought you might enjoy it, so I’m sharing it here. Bird Language One day in the bluest of summer weather, Sketching under a whispering oak, I heard five bobolinks laughing together Over some ornithological joke. What the fun was I couldn’t discover. Language of birds is a riddle on earth. What could they find in whiteweed and clover To split their sides with such musical mirth? Was it some prank of the prodigal summer, Face in the cloud or voice in the breeze, Querulous catbird, woodpecker drummer, Cawing of crows high over the trees? Was it some chipmunk’s chatter, or weasel Under the stone-wall stealthy and sly? Or was the joke about me at my easel, Trying to catch the tints of the sky? Still they flew tipsily, shaking all over, Bubbling with jollity, brimful of glee, While I sat listening deep in the clover, Wondering what their jargon could be. ‘Twas but the voice of a morning the brightest That ever dawned over yon shadowy hills; ‘Twas but the song of all joy that is lightest,— Sunshine breaking in laughter and trills. Vain to conjecture the words they are singing; Only by tones can we follow the tune In the full heart of the summer fields ringing, Ringing the rhythmical gladness of June! Reply
BDW January 26, 2023 Mr. Southerland’s “A Stonechat Listens at the Asylum Window” is a remarkable sonnet arabesque. A Southern Man by Cause Bewilder “I am the red-winged blackbird’s gulping tone, The swallow, swift, the collared dove, the hoopoe—” —Charles Southerland I picture him in plaid, a rimy Whitman from the South, a white unwieldy beard, a taste of bile in his mouth, a feral hog upon a sharp, ridged hill, from Arkansas, who showed some of the symptom’s, but did not have Parkinson’s. He was too real. I couldn’t take his diction for too long. His language was too rich, too filled with life, I couldn’t yawn. I longed to flee; he kept reminding me of character, and what it was to be a poet in America. Good Lord, a stupid hoopoe. Who, who, who, o, who is he? Not Poe within primeval wood, nor Faulkner in a tree. Reply
C.B. Anderson January 28, 2023 Parkinson’s/Arkansas is brilliant and so is character/America. Charlie is everything you say, and more. Reply
BDW January 31, 2023 I notice that recently Mr. Anderson is loosening up in his rhymescape. Is it about time?
Charles Southerland January 29, 2023 Dear Bruce, how am I supposed to reply to that? I don’t even know where to begin. Thank you from the very bottom. Reply
BDW January 31, 2023 Not an Apostrophe to Charles Southerland by Cause Bewilder As I scan poetry in English in the NewMillennium, I have felt the need to write a tennos on Mr. Southerland’s poetry for some time, which I both admire, and dislike, for so many reasons. As I have pointed out some of my complaints elsewhere @ SCP, I shan’t do so here. “The Stonechat Listens…” was particularly interesting to me after writing “Coronal”, which was infested with Texan birds, having left the Pacific Northwest and its bird flows in the previous decade. First, and foremost, the poetry of Charles Southerland is so good…comparatively. I cannot think of another present-day writer who does as much as he does with English; and part of it is that he is just so damn American, not internationally and historic’lly, like Mr. Yankevich (whose syllabics were among the more interesting of the NewMillennium), but rather targeted, like Mr. Anderson’s verse, or the prose of Mr. Thoreau. In fact, while reading and rereading “The Stonechat Listens…” I thought time and again of Mr. Thoreau and the birds, not Mr. Audubon (but particularly the loon of “Walden”), and only secondarily of Mr. Roethke’s verse. What I thought was most striking about the last line, was its Keatsian note. [And though I do admire the work of Keats, I do not share the enthusiasm for Keats of writers, like Canadian poet Mr. Gosselin.] I wanted to include Thoreau in the lines of “A Southern Man”, but I didn’t want to disrupt the final line’s major pun. There were many other things I wanted to include; however, not the apostrophe, which was inadvertently left in.
Janice Canerdy January 26, 2023 Such a vividly descriptive, deeply meaningful poem! To me, it expresses the theme, “I become a part of all I appreciate and understand.” Reply
Charles Souherland January 27, 2023 Sorry for the delay in response. The snowstorm knocked out our power the past four days. Still working on repairs. Thanks for all your kind comments. I will respond to each in kind soon. All my best, Charlie. Reply
Monika Cooper February 2, 2023 I asked if you were lonely; you said, no. I wondered if I heard you nearly right. How to live with an answer like that? The poem haunts and hints of many things, things that lie between the speaker and the once-close distant one. It protects its spaces. A overheard conversation, with resonances but a heart of mystery, like the voices of birds. Reply
Charles Southerland February 4, 2023 Monika, those two lines are the premise of the entire poem. Very astute reading. Thanks. Reply