Mansfield in a Blackwell dress, and actress Bel Powley in 2020A Poem on ‘Red Carpet’ Dresses by Cheryl Corey The Society July 11, 2024 Culture, Poetry 17 Comments . The Red Carpet There’s nothing left to tease imagination When so-called starlets, vying for attention, Sashay the carpet practically nude; And you don’t have to be a total prude To know when something isn’t right. Here You have these women wearing “dresses” sheer Enough to clearly see their breast and butt; Enough to make the viewer mutter, “What The… (expletive)”. Remember Blackwell’s list? (Oh, that nasty “white supremacist”!) The Ten Worst-Dressed? He had an eye for fashion, Knew how to drape the female form with passion; The likes of Russell, Mansfield, and Lamour, When Hollywood meant glamour and less was more; When like the view of Betty Grable’s cheek, You never saw the whole, but just a peek. Today they strut without a sense of shame— So sad to see what some will do for fame. . Richard Blackwell (1922-2008): Noted fashion designer and critic. He dressed movie stars like Jayne Mansfield, Jane Russell, and Dorothy Lamour. His infamous lists of the worst-dressed spared no one. . . Cheryl Corey is a poet who lives in Connecticut. “Three Sisters,” her trio of poems about the sisters of Fate which were first published by the Society of Classical Poets, are featured in “Gods and Monsters,” an anthology of mythological poems (MacMillan Children’s Books, 2023). NOTE TO READERS: If you enjoyed this poem or other content, please consider making a donation to the Society of Classical Poets. The Society of Classical Poets does not endorse any views expressed in individual poems or commentary. Trending now: 17 Responses Roy Eugene Peterson July 11, 2024 Interesting topic “well-covered” by your fashion-centric poem. Glamour long ago seems to have left the red carpet and stage “bare.” Reply Cheryl Corey July 11, 2024 I love your word-play, Roy. Reply Julian D. Woodruff July 11, 2024 Good one, Cheryl. Maybe back then there was less to be gained from being in bad taste. Reply Cheryl Corey July 11, 2024 If you Google Met Gala sheer dresses 2024 or sheer dress trend you’ll get an eyeful of how sluttified the women are made to appear. Reply Susan Jarvis Bryant July 11, 2024 Cheryl, you have picked up on the sheer shamelessness of the red-carpet strut with this poem. Well done! However, I fear the red carpet is now embracing hairy areas where downright cockiness in a diaphanous gown is welcome … if you get my drift. Reply Cheryl Corey July 11, 2024 Between the slits up to “there” (how can they possibly sit?), cut-outs, the current “under-boob” fad, and sheer gowns exposing their nether regions – you’re right. It is shameless. Reply Joseph S. Salemi July 11, 2024 I’ll never forget Blackwell’s judgment on Martha Stewart: “She dresses like the centerfold for The Farmer’s Almanac.” Blackwell only lampooned wealthy women who certainly had the money to dress stylishly, but who for some reason never did so. Reply Cheryl Corey July 11, 2024 Their egos were probably so fragile that they were easily talked into believing that they looked fabulous in a trash bag. Reply Sally Cook July 11, 2024 I’ve always loved clothes, but this stuff is beyond the pale ! Now I give things away because I’m counting the tunes I will find occasions to wear it! Reply Cheryl Corey July 11, 2024 I became a clotheshorse during my working years, probably because I grew up with hand-me-downs and next to nothing, but in retirement I’ve done a lot of purging and become more discriminating. Reply Peter Venable July 11, 2024 Simply, well done both craft and message. Reply Cheryl Corey July 11, 2024 Thank you, Peter. Reply Cynthia Erlandson July 11, 2024 This is a clever way to make a great point, Cheryl. It’s kind of ironic that, instead of the clothes being meant to bring out the beauty of the women’s bodies, now the goal seems, instead, to be the kind of extreme “creativity” (must be different than anything that’s ever been done before) that simply uses/abuses women’s bodies to show off a new piece of avant-garde fashion “art”. Reply Cheryl Corey July 11, 2024 I don’t know what’s sadder – that these women are gullible enough to wear such outfits, or that a designer would think to dress a woman in such a manner to begin with. Reply Warren Bonham July 11, 2024 The Empresses have no clothes and thanks so much for pointing it out in an entertaining way. Reply Cheryl Corey July 11, 2024 You’re welcome, Warren. There’s nothing wrong with being proud of your physique, but these young ladies may someday regret such over-exposure. Reply Margaret Coats July 12, 2024 Good to praise draping “the female form with passion,” especially because “drape” implies flowing fabric that conceals a great deal. I’m interested to see the illustration appears to be a photo of a famed dress with a provocative covering, namely, the metallic shield over the right nipple. If I remember correctly, this was later imitated, in a less imaginative manner, at an important show by American designers in Paris. The sleazier imitation covered one breast with a patch that could be unsnapped and lowered to reveal the naked whole, which the model did center stage. She created a sensation among French viewers (or should I say “voyeurs”) admiring American lewdness superior to their own designs. Reply Leave a Reply Cancel ReplyYour email address will not be published.CommentName* Email* Website Δ This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
Roy Eugene Peterson July 11, 2024 Interesting topic “well-covered” by your fashion-centric poem. Glamour long ago seems to have left the red carpet and stage “bare.” Reply
Julian D. Woodruff July 11, 2024 Good one, Cheryl. Maybe back then there was less to be gained from being in bad taste. Reply
Cheryl Corey July 11, 2024 If you Google Met Gala sheer dresses 2024 or sheer dress trend you’ll get an eyeful of how sluttified the women are made to appear. Reply
Susan Jarvis Bryant July 11, 2024 Cheryl, you have picked up on the sheer shamelessness of the red-carpet strut with this poem. Well done! However, I fear the red carpet is now embracing hairy areas where downright cockiness in a diaphanous gown is welcome … if you get my drift. Reply
Cheryl Corey July 11, 2024 Between the slits up to “there” (how can they possibly sit?), cut-outs, the current “under-boob” fad, and sheer gowns exposing their nether regions – you’re right. It is shameless. Reply
Joseph S. Salemi July 11, 2024 I’ll never forget Blackwell’s judgment on Martha Stewart: “She dresses like the centerfold for The Farmer’s Almanac.” Blackwell only lampooned wealthy women who certainly had the money to dress stylishly, but who for some reason never did so. Reply
Cheryl Corey July 11, 2024 Their egos were probably so fragile that they were easily talked into believing that they looked fabulous in a trash bag. Reply
Sally Cook July 11, 2024 I’ve always loved clothes, but this stuff is beyond the pale ! Now I give things away because I’m counting the tunes I will find occasions to wear it! Reply
Cheryl Corey July 11, 2024 I became a clotheshorse during my working years, probably because I grew up with hand-me-downs and next to nothing, but in retirement I’ve done a lot of purging and become more discriminating. Reply
Cynthia Erlandson July 11, 2024 This is a clever way to make a great point, Cheryl. It’s kind of ironic that, instead of the clothes being meant to bring out the beauty of the women’s bodies, now the goal seems, instead, to be the kind of extreme “creativity” (must be different than anything that’s ever been done before) that simply uses/abuses women’s bodies to show off a new piece of avant-garde fashion “art”. Reply
Cheryl Corey July 11, 2024 I don’t know what’s sadder – that these women are gullible enough to wear such outfits, or that a designer would think to dress a woman in such a manner to begin with. Reply
Warren Bonham July 11, 2024 The Empresses have no clothes and thanks so much for pointing it out in an entertaining way. Reply
Cheryl Corey July 11, 2024 You’re welcome, Warren. There’s nothing wrong with being proud of your physique, but these young ladies may someday regret such over-exposure. Reply
Margaret Coats July 12, 2024 Good to praise draping “the female form with passion,” especially because “drape” implies flowing fabric that conceals a great deal. I’m interested to see the illustration appears to be a photo of a famed dress with a provocative covering, namely, the metallic shield over the right nipple. If I remember correctly, this was later imitated, in a less imaginative manner, at an important show by American designers in Paris. The sleazier imitation covered one breast with a patch that could be unsnapped and lowered to reveal the naked whole, which the model did center stage. She created a sensation among French viewers (or should I say “voyeurs”) admiring American lewdness superior to their own designs. Reply