illustration of the Frog Prince (Walter Crane) ‘Conjugation: Tense with Mood’: A Poem by C.B. Anderson The Society July 31, 2025 Humor, Poetry 11 Comments . Conjugation: Tense with Mood —a verbal disagreement between the indicative and the subjunctive If I were all that I could be, Perhaps I’d spend eternity Cavorting in a field of lilies With thoroughbred seductive fillies. But I am just a common man, Essentially no better than A frog that’s never been a prince. I shower and I always rinse The residue of soap away As if it were the perfect day To take my place among the gentry That heretofore have barred my entry Into that posh patrician club Above the fray—but here’s the rub: In style and speech I tend to falter, A plight good grammar cannot alter. The worst of after-dinner speakers, Decked out in T-shirt, shabby sneakers And what might once have been blue denim, I struggle to hold back my venom. . . C.B. Anderson was the longtime gardener for the PBS television series, The Victory Garden. Hundreds of his poems have appeared in scores of print and electronic journals out of North America, Great Britain, Ireland, Austria, Australia and India. His collection, Mortal Soup and the Blue Yonder was published in 2013 by White Violet Press. NOTE TO READERS: If you enjoyed this poem or other content, please consider making a donation to the Society of Classical Poets. The Society of Classical Poets does not endorse any views expressed in individual poems or commentary. ***Read Our Comments Policy Here*** 11 Responses Roy Eugene Peterson July 31, 2025 If this were you, at least you write wonderful poems. Reply C.B. Anderson August 1, 2025 Yes, Roy. Who am I, and why am I here? Reply Joseph S. Salemi July 31, 2025 Kip, this is a pure delight. Perfect quatrains composed of perfect couplets! And you have used the subjunctive four times in this poem: 1. If I were 2. Perhaps I’d [I would] spend 3. As if it were 4. might once have been That’s twice in an if-clause, once in a future conditional, and once in a past contrafactual. You certainly know your subjunctives! Great rhymes: denim/venom, lillies/fillies, gentry-entry, and best of all that falter-alter. Perhaps you remember that old song with these lyrics: Don’t you falter at the altar — Your father didn’t falter, son — that’s why you’re here! Of course the song lyric uses the homophone /altar/ instead of /alter/, but in any case it’s tough to get a rhyme for “falter.” (At best we have halter, palter, and Walter.) Reply C.B. Anderson August 1, 2025 Actually, Joseph, this was a poem I had been saving for a future edition of TRINACRIA, so I’m mighty glad you approve. Some authorities have wrongly said that the subjunctive mood is dead in English, but the more I speak, read and think, the more I keep finding examples of it, and if that be the case, then the subjunctive is still alive and kicking. Rhymes, as I must have stated before, are free for the taking. Reply Margaret Coats July 31, 2025 Well done! And practically unique, as we have precious few poems on grammar. But as one reader with a strong interest, I’m greatly appreciative. May I call the oh, so suitable title a capstone to the conjugation? Now back to my psalter. Reply Joseph S. Salemi August 1, 2025 We have one other such poem here at the SCP. See my piece “The Composition Teacher Addresses His Class” (May 6, 2018). https://classicalpoets.org/2018/05/the-composition-teacher-addresses-his-class-by-joseph-s-salemi/ Reply C.B. Anderson August 1, 2025 Every poem, Margaret, it seems to me, is a practicum involving every element of the English language. In your own poems, fidelity to this belief is usually quite evident. And a “heh-heh” as well, but let’s not forget “daughter.” Reply Christian Muller August 1, 2025 Excellent wit. As other comments have mentioned, the ability to mix grammar play into your poem is wonderful. Reply C.B. Anderson August 1, 2025 Honestly, Christian, I can’t help it. When most of my high school senior class was in Washington D.C. on the class trip, I stayed behind and read books about grammar in my high school library. I should have studied physics. Reply Brian Yapko August 1, 2025 C.B., the grammar aspects of this poem are indeed full of wit and this is indeed an unusual and accomplished poem. But I’m intrigued by the narrative — the speaker’s fantasy of the posh patrician club where good grammar simply cannot rescue a bad speech. In fact, I detect more than a hint of impatience with snobbishness. I sincerely doubt your speaker would be the worst of after-dinner speakers — unless he’s judged by pointless priorities which have little to do with wit and honesty. Along these lines, I love the rhyme of denim and venom which lends vivid imagery to the mocking of pretensions. Reply C.B. Anderson August 1, 2025 I don’t mind snobs, Brian, because they remind us, by contrast, of how grounded we are. I personally prefer threadbare clothes because they are much more comfortable than new store-bought garments, but that doesn’t make me a good after-dinner speaker. Reply Leave a Reply Cancel ReplyYour email address will not be published.CommentName* Email* Website Δ This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
Joseph S. Salemi July 31, 2025 Kip, this is a pure delight. Perfect quatrains composed of perfect couplets! And you have used the subjunctive four times in this poem: 1. If I were 2. Perhaps I’d [I would] spend 3. As if it were 4. might once have been That’s twice in an if-clause, once in a future conditional, and once in a past contrafactual. You certainly know your subjunctives! Great rhymes: denim/venom, lillies/fillies, gentry-entry, and best of all that falter-alter. Perhaps you remember that old song with these lyrics: Don’t you falter at the altar — Your father didn’t falter, son — that’s why you’re here! Of course the song lyric uses the homophone /altar/ instead of /alter/, but in any case it’s tough to get a rhyme for “falter.” (At best we have halter, palter, and Walter.) Reply
C.B. Anderson August 1, 2025 Actually, Joseph, this was a poem I had been saving for a future edition of TRINACRIA, so I’m mighty glad you approve. Some authorities have wrongly said that the subjunctive mood is dead in English, but the more I speak, read and think, the more I keep finding examples of it, and if that be the case, then the subjunctive is still alive and kicking. Rhymes, as I must have stated before, are free for the taking. Reply
Margaret Coats July 31, 2025 Well done! And practically unique, as we have precious few poems on grammar. But as one reader with a strong interest, I’m greatly appreciative. May I call the oh, so suitable title a capstone to the conjugation? Now back to my psalter. Reply
Joseph S. Salemi August 1, 2025 We have one other such poem here at the SCP. See my piece “The Composition Teacher Addresses His Class” (May 6, 2018). https://classicalpoets.org/2018/05/the-composition-teacher-addresses-his-class-by-joseph-s-salemi/ Reply
C.B. Anderson August 1, 2025 Every poem, Margaret, it seems to me, is a practicum involving every element of the English language. In your own poems, fidelity to this belief is usually quite evident. And a “heh-heh” as well, but let’s not forget “daughter.” Reply
Christian Muller August 1, 2025 Excellent wit. As other comments have mentioned, the ability to mix grammar play into your poem is wonderful. Reply
C.B. Anderson August 1, 2025 Honestly, Christian, I can’t help it. When most of my high school senior class was in Washington D.C. on the class trip, I stayed behind and read books about grammar in my high school library. I should have studied physics. Reply
Brian Yapko August 1, 2025 C.B., the grammar aspects of this poem are indeed full of wit and this is indeed an unusual and accomplished poem. But I’m intrigued by the narrative — the speaker’s fantasy of the posh patrician club where good grammar simply cannot rescue a bad speech. In fact, I detect more than a hint of impatience with snobbishness. I sincerely doubt your speaker would be the worst of after-dinner speakers — unless he’s judged by pointless priorities which have little to do with wit and honesty. Along these lines, I love the rhyme of denim and venom which lends vivid imagery to the mocking of pretensions. Reply
C.B. Anderson August 1, 2025 I don’t mind snobs, Brian, because they remind us, by contrast, of how grounded we are. I personally prefer threadbare clothes because they are much more comfortable than new store-bought garments, but that doesn’t make me a good after-dinner speaker. Reply